MGPraxis42,984 papers mapped

Why Investors Should Not Be Cautious About the Academic Approach to Testing for Stock Market Anomalies

Ángel Pardo Tornero, Brian M. Lucey·2003

“This paper addresses these concerns, and provides an example of a strategy derived from academic papers that indicates how and to what profitability such a strategy can be implemented.”

AssetEquities
StrategySeasonality
GeographyEurope
ClaimProfit

Missing from abstract: benchmark, out-of-sample test, costs, multiple testing, universe

Institutional-grade audit of this strategy.
£5 — Request the audit
  • Audit of the paper claims accounting for costs, luck, crises, originality, geography, etc.
  • Reproduction code integratable into Bloomberg, IBKR, etc.
  • Bias-free datasets for backtesting included
  • Delivered in 2 working days
The paper's neighbourhoodSeasonality and calendar effects by year
■ equities■ volatility and options20001This paper200320052201022015202022026■ equities■ volatility and options20001This paper20032201022015202022026
The family is counted across the whole universe. Asset, method and authors are counted inside the family.
Similar paperscitationsame methodsame assetsame authors
Calendar Anomalies in Stock Index Futures by Carchano and Tornero2011
Calendar Effects of Asset Pricing Factors by Fan et al.2026
Sectoral Intramonth Momentum Cycle Exploiting Turn-of-the-Month Patterns in Sector ETF Strategies by Vojtko and Dujava2026
Exploiting Superstition in the Investment Strategies: Case of Friday the 13th Effect by Ştefanescu and Dumitriu2018
Stock market efficiency in South Eastern Europe: testing return predictability and presence of calendar effects2017
Not yet audited by MarketGraphs Praxis. Tags from the abstract. Counts from the universe.
RSS · Contacts